|
Post by linda712 on Jun 25, 2009 22:29:50 GMT -4
Karma! Keep watching for the signs! P.S. Jetdoc -- totally agree.
|
|
|
Post by pete1 on Jul 13, 2009 4:52:27 GMT -4
Stacey.....www.savestacey.com says that the employer in question is The Fireguard Corp.. Could you post the address and other pertinent info. on the company. The citizens should be aware of this information. Seems the illegals they hire under the table get more respect than the hard working citizens.
|
|
kisinceiwas5
Full Member
Chuck Norris CAN touch MC Hammer.
Posts: 230
|
Post by kisinceiwas5 on Jul 13, 2009 5:41:59 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by shoregurrl on Jul 13, 2009 8:53:59 GMT -4
The website is www.savestacy.com ---there is no "e" in Stacy's name, she is just Plain Jane Stacy. Pete, your research of public records is dead on. While Ms. Bernstein is unable to confirm or deny, as her family we are able to answer the question. The Fireguard Corporation 798 Cromwell Park Drive Suite V Glen Burnie, MD 21061 As stated before, the name of the company is completely a matter of public record linked to Ms. Bernstein online at: casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inquiry/inquiry-index.jspwww.savestacy.com
|
|
|
Post by shoregurrl on Jul 14, 2009 9:35:49 GMT -4
Thank you!
It's always nice when someone else isn't afraid to stand up for what's right....
|
|
guest
New Member
Posts: 30
|
Post by guest on Jul 17, 2009 13:18:24 GMT -4
Thank you! It's always nice when someone else isn't afraid to stand up for what's right.... The post above was spam.
|
|
|
Post by terpski on Jul 21, 2009 23:21:00 GMT -4
Thank you! It's always nice when someone else isn't afraid to stand up for what's right.... The post above was spam. What does that mean? Stacy's story is spam or that last post was spam?
|
|
|
Post by linda712 on Jul 21, 2009 23:41:26 GMT -4
No, not Stacy's story -- there was a post after Shoregurrl's that had 3 or 4 links on the bottom of it. When you clicked on them, they went to websites offering items for sale. I'm not sure that they were "spam" -- but the post is gone now.
Stacy's story is sadly, true....
|
|
|
Post by terpski on Jul 21, 2009 23:47:45 GMT -4
No, not Stacy's story -- there was a post after Shoregurrl's that had 3 or 4 links on the bottom of it. When you clicked on them, they went to websites offering items for sale. I'm not sure that they were "spam" -- but the post is gone now. Stacy's story is sadly, true.... Good! Well, not good for Stacy, but I'm glad some people are sticking up for her. I've just read up on the story and it is certainly suspicious. There are just too many loose ends on the other side. I hope justice is served.
|
|
|
Post by linda712 on Jul 21, 2009 23:53:37 GMT -4
To be very honest with you, I don't like the "smell" of it either.....my gut instinct is really in high gear here......something's just not right. Until all the facts are in and laid before the court on "D" day, we'll just have to wait for the outcome. I'm routing for Stacy.
|
|
|
Post by terpski on Jul 22, 2009 0:00:48 GMT -4
I know. Something is fishy here and I think (note to all.. IMHO) it's a business (although not big) that was found out somehow and now they are taking it out because she found something 'not right'. The whole thing is weird when you look at the documents. The timing is weird and the statements of her firing is weird.
|
|
|
Post by terpski on Jul 22, 2009 0:23:08 GMT -4
And I have no dog in the race, by the way.
|
|
|
Post by shoregurrl on Jul 22, 2009 8:36:13 GMT -4
Thanks for the support!
It can honestly be said that Stacy and her family have no idea who Terpski is, but we sure appreciate the support!
Thank you Terpski and Sequel!
|
|
|
Post by pete1 on Jul 22, 2009 23:02:51 GMT -4
shoregurrl..........It's time to organize and picket the States Attorney's Office in Centreville. I have hard evidence of corruption that is happening now, and in the past by these champions of our Constitution. I for one will stand by your side with a picket sign, and a video camera. Any other volunteers ready to fight the deeply embedded corruption in our County?
|
|
|
Post by shoregurrl on Jul 23, 2009 9:20:50 GMT -4
This week alone we have talked to 3 highly respected lawyers outside of Queen Anne's County and EACH of them said that Queen Anne's County is known for being "a good old boys' network" and that, unless you are part of this network, you do not stand a chance in any legal battle in Queen Anne's County.
Our family sure wishes we had known this before, but it's not too late to do something about it now.
|
|
|
Post by kl on Jul 23, 2009 12:33:19 GMT -4
Thanks, Pete. Let's set the date. Any other volunteers to stand by our sides? This week alone I have talked to 3 highly respected lawyers outside of Queen Anne's County and EACH of them said that Queen Anne's County is known for being "a good old boys' network" and that, unless you are part of this network, you do not stand a chance in any legal battle in Queen Anne's County. Our family sure wishes we had known this before, but it's not too late to do something about it now. You and me both. And I know this firsthand, up close, and personal. Shore, see if you can get some video of the G.O.B.'s lunching together. Local newspapers don't even report the corruption there.
|
|
|
Post by linda712 on Jul 23, 2009 16:03:36 GMT -4
I have a question, Shoregurrl -- if the company bringing the charges is in AA County -- why is this case being tried in Q.A? Is that part of what you wish you knew ahead of time?
P.S. an outstanding, highly reputable attorney on "the other side" also said the same thing to me..............a lot of them don't like to even come over here. Shame, shame, shame.....
|
|
|
Post by shoregurrl on Jul 23, 2009 17:39:31 GMT -4
Hey Sequel, GREAT question! One we have asked ourselves many times. Very intuitive of you. Definitely part of what we wished we knew ahead of time.
What the "outsiders" are saying is absolutely a shame. In the end the only people it hurts are the residents and taxpayers.
|
|
|
Post by linda712 on Jul 23, 2009 18:25:24 GMT -4
I don't know about intuitive. Should have been obvious once any of us saw the company's adress.......well, that certainly adds to the "smell". I tell ya, I just don't "get" this case.....just keep shaking my head .......
|
|
|
Post by kl on Jul 24, 2009 5:57:58 GMT -4
And have been offered suggestions, whenever someone has to deal with District Court there in Centreville, it's always best to find and hire a lawyer from Rockville, Baltimore, heck, even Virginia, if the lawyer can practice in both states, because if you retain one of those Centreville sleazebags, you may as well give up!!
|
|
|
Post by pete1 on Jul 24, 2009 16:32:46 GMT -4
terrapin.........What I see here is the abuse of power once again being exhibited by the State Attorneys Office. Stacy's life seems to be an open book on this issue. That tells me something.
|
|
|
Post by linda712 on Jul 24, 2009 17:29:29 GMT -4
Terrapin -- here's a link I found on grand juries. They scare me....
Shoregurrl -- sorry, but I do have more questions....hope you don't mind. I'm just trying to figure this out in my head.
Do you know why this case was filed in Q.A.? Can you tell us?
What type of hearing was this sworn testimony transcribed from? If a court transcript, is it public information?
Was Q.A. County aware of the situation Stacy was in when they hired her, or did they find out afterwards? What did they say to her when they "let her go"? You're fired? Did they accuse her of wrongdoing on the job? Did they document in writing a series of wrong doing on her part? Is it legal to fire someone when they're in the situation she's in?
Maybe I'll stop for now.........see how bizaar my mind is.........or isn't......
How long was Stacy employed by Q.A. County?
One more: What does County money have to do with an investigation into to case? I know part of the State's Attorney's salary/benefits is from county funds, and the rest from the State -- but that money is already determined in the budget. Why would they spend extra money? Or am I reading your statement incorrectly regarding filed under the Public Information Act?
|
|
|
Post by shoregurrl on Jul 24, 2009 17:37:34 GMT -4
Hey Sequel, no problem.
Stacy was never employed by the state or county. Her employer was The Fireguard Corporation.
We do not know why this case was filed in Q.A. County. All we do know for certain is that this case would never have made it past the initial complaint if it were done in Anne Arundel County.
Yes, the transcript is a matter of public record. In the case of Bernstein vs. Fireguard in Anne Arundel County, as part of the Discovery process, the transcipt mentioned and all of the other complaints filed by Ms. Bernstein actually became part of the court record. Ms. Bernstein did not feel that they were relevant to that particular civil suit, however the former employer and the court felt differently. Ms. Bernstein was ordered to produce all of that information, and so it is now a matter of public record. But, most people do not know that, which was one of the reasons that it was important for them to silence Stacy quickly.
After her employment with Fireguard ended, Ms. Bernstein did not then go work for the state/county. She obtained a position at a private employer in Easton. Because, as part of the harassment, she was arrested at work, she was fired. The Investigator stated she was arrested at work because he did not know where to find her. The truth is that they were at her home only 2 weeks prior and she certainly had not moved during that time. When she was fired from the private employer in Easton, she was told that she was being terminated solely because of the situation and not because of any performance issues or misconduct.
As to the relevance of the amount of money spent working on this case, the former employer is using taxpayer money, not their own, to conduct their whisteblower retaliatory tactics and silence Stacy.
|
|
|
Post by pete1 on Jul 24, 2009 17:51:23 GMT -4
shoregurrl..........Your correct about the grand jury. The Sates Attorneys office controls what goes on with the grand jury. This is against the law......True story - I have on video a guard at the Annapolis Mall lunging into my vehicle assaulting me, and attempting to steal my video camera. The A.A.Co. police who work as security guards for the Annapolis Mall in full police uniform refused to take action. The court commissioner refused to charge the guard, but instead allowed the guard to charge me under a restraining order. Armed with the video and the Fraternal of Police Lawyer I went to court. The judge viewed the video, and threw the case out. Judge Wilcox did nothing about the perjury the guard committed on his sworn affidavit, and his testimony. I was then charged criminally by the States Attorney for criminally assaulting the guard Mr. Anthony Christian. I demanded that the case go to court so I can have my day. After three months the States Attorney refused to take the case to court. Guard Anthony Christian committed perjury on two affidavits, and once in court. The grand jury would not accept my complaint. Why? The same States Attorneys Office has one of their people conducting the grand jury......If someone will show me how to post the video on KOL I will do so for everyone to see....
|
|
|
Post by falgar25 on Jul 24, 2009 19:02:29 GMT -4
The purpose of the grand jury is not to determine guilt or innocence. The purpose of the grand jury is to determine probably cause. Rather than being afraid of the grand jury, we should be thankful for it. Sure, in this case it may not have gone the way you wanted, but sometimes it might.
Without the grand jury every case the prosecutor wants to bring will go to court. With the grand jury the prosecutor has to demonstrate that he has enough evidence to take something to court. Without the grand jury it is the prosecutor's office that makes the determination. With the grand jury it is a group of citizens that make the determination.
|
|