|
Post by RobMoore on May 25, 2014 8:41:52 GMT -4
Why is the register of wills such a popular position to run for? I've seen 5 different people going for it.
|
|
|
Post by JJ on May 25, 2014 8:43:52 GMT -4
No Press Release, No Apologies, and No he didn't steal overtime, if he did then there would have been evidence and facts to support the criminal charges that the State's Attorney dismissed! Waiting for that press release "Charges Dropped against Deputy for Allegedly Stealing Overtime" Good luck with that one!
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on May 25, 2014 9:13:56 GMT -4
Why is the register of wills such a popular position to run for? I've seen 5 different people going for it. 100K plus salary I bet
|
|
|
Post by falgar25 on May 25, 2014 9:13:59 GMT -4
No Press Release, No Apologies, and No he didn't steal overtime, if he did then there would have been evidence and facts to support the criminal charges that the State's Attorney dismissed! Waiting for that press release "Charges Dropped against Deputy for Allegedly Stealing Overtime" Good luck with that one! Almost right. No press release, no apologies, and no further comment on a personnel issue - as it should be. You forgot to mention that Queen Anne's County acted only after the information was also reviewed by the Caroline County State's Attorney's office which recommended the charges. I know of at least three similar cases (none involving any Sheriff's office) where evidence existed, agreements were made, restitution was paid, and charges were not pursued. I have no knowledge of this case but it is possible that a similar agreement occurred. By the way, welcome back to the forum.
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on May 25, 2014 9:15:31 GMT -4
No Press Release, No Apologies, and No he didn't steal overtime, if he did then there would have been evidence and facts to support the criminal charges that the State's Attorney dismissed! Waiting for that press release "Charges Dropped against Deputy for Allegedly Stealing Overtime" Good luck with that one! Well I can't expand on it. I'd certainly hope he'd get his job back or at a minimum keep his eligibility to work for another dept. Has this Deputy gone public with any comments?
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on May 25, 2014 9:16:39 GMT -4
No Press Release, No Apologies, and No he didn't steal overtime, if he did then there would have been evidence and facts to support the criminal charges that the State's Attorney dismissed! Waiting for that press release "Charges Dropped against Deputy for Allegedly Stealing Overtime" Good luck with that one! Almost right. No press release, no apologies, and no further comment on a personnel issue - as it should be. You forgot to mention that Queen Anne's County acted only after the information was also reviewed by the Caroline County State's Attorney's office which recommended the charges. I know of at least three similar cases (none involving any Sheriff's office) where evidence existed, agreements were made, restitution was paid, and charges were not pursued. I have no knowledge of this case but it is possible that a similar agreement occurred. By the way, welcome back to the forum. Very good point
|
|
|
Post by emsguru on May 25, 2014 9:17:12 GMT -4
Two lives and careers ruined and no apology: There are two tragedies that seem to be left out of the conversation when it comes to Sheriff Gery Hofmann. Although these topics are danced around and yes I'm sure, considered "old news" to some, they are very real to those involved. A Deputy was basically degraded, humiliated and terminated for "stealing" over $10,000 in overtime from the Sheriffs Office. Immediately the Sheriffs biggest defender spoke up and said the investigation was thorough and the Deputy got caught. Not the Sheriffs Office fault. By the way, this is the same defender that now says Sheriff Gery is now INNOCENT in his current Federal Civil Rights violation cases. (I'm confused, their investigation is thorough also). So now all of the charges in the Deputy's case have been dismissed. The fault and the reason this case was dismissed? Mis-management by Sheriff Gery Hofmann and his crew. The first person to be publicly embarrassed and lose their job as a Deputy was a victim of sexual assaults by Sheriff Gery Hofmann's brother. His brother pleaded guilty in this case. The smear campaign against her is too disgusting to mention but one thing is for sure, those comments are not coming from her or her family. That case appears to be in its final stages and is going to be a total embarrassment to Queen Annes County. I could go on and on about these tragedies but perhaps the most disturbing thing is this, Sheriff Raymond Gary or Gery Hofmann has never manned up, looked these people in the eye nor put out a public statement saying "I'm was wrong, I am sorry". Quite the contrary, he spends his waking hours defending his failures and silently tries to figure out where he is going to get 10-Million dollars to pay his personal lawsuit brought on by own incompetence. At the end of the day Gery Hofmann's actions remind me of this quote: "I never made a mistake in my life; at least, never one that I couldn't explain away afterwards. Did the Deputy falsify his OT records or not? Did he/she get his job back since these charges were dropped( I honestly don't know if they were or not) ? Are they fighting to get their job back if they were wronged? Do know if Gary ever privately apologized assuming he did do something wrong? You seem to have a lot of inside info on all of this. Since you claim to, have you gone public to the States Attorney with your knowledge of the cases? They were dropped. Details aren't 100% known. He resigned. Why would you go back to work for the same folks who went out of their way to find something to charge you with? The deputy will still be able to be a police officer in the state of MD and he gets to keep his K9 that he was given. So he will likely move on to a bigger better department at the expense of the tax payers which is great for him. Something that should be addressed is the retention rate of deputies. The county pays to send them to a 6 month police academy, a few months of field training, uniforms and the money spent on background investigations costs a significant amount of money. Perhaps upwards of 50 to 60 grand per deputy just to have them leave after a few years to go to another department.
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on May 25, 2014 9:34:50 GMT -4
Did the Deputy falsify his OT records or not? Did he/she get his job back since these charges were dropped( I honestly don't know if they were or not) ? Are they fighting to get their job back if they were wronged? Do know if Gary ever privately apologized assuming he did do something wrong? You seem to have a lot of inside info on all of this. Since you claim to, have you gone public to the States Attorney with your knowledge of the cases? They were dropped. Details aren't 100% known. He resigned. Why would you go back to work for the same folks who went out of their way to find something to charge you with? The deputy will still be able to be a police officer in the state of MD and he gets to keep his K9 that he was given. So he will likely move on to a bigger better department at the expense of the tax payers which is great for him. Something that should be addressed is the retention rate of deputies. The county pays to send them to a 6 month police academy, a few months of field training, uniforms and the money spent on background investigations costs a significant amount of money. Perhaps upwards of 50 to 60 grand per deputy just to have them leave after a few years to go to another department. Lots of depts allow one to resign rather than be terminated so who really knows the full outcome or details. As far as retention goes the pay for QA and all of the shore is simply awful when competing departments in other counties pay far more. That's a fact of life
|
|
|
Post by deepsea on May 25, 2014 11:44:47 GMT -4
So now you have your foot in your mouth and you need a lame excuse to dislike Mr Banks. Only three men running for Sheriff and two are white and one is black. So who do you attack? Speaks Volumes? Also I don't have to defend myself to you and answer your questions. Stay on track and stop trying to deflect what you said.
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on May 25, 2014 11:54:33 GMT -4
So now you have your foot in your mouth and you need a lame excuse to dislike Mr Banks. Only three men running for Sheriff and two are white and one is black. So who do you attack? Speaks Volumes? Also I don't have to defend myself to you and answer your questions. Stay on track and stop trying to deflect what you said. Of course you won't answer my questions because we both know the answer is Banks never has... A lame excuse is a candidate that hasn't done anything in the community for anyone or the kids?? But hey, keep claiming its black vs white if that's what makes your agenda work for you You can't even give me anything on Banks at all....stellar persuasion on your part. Stay on track and keep crying just vote everyone out by answering do it just because Sheep
|
|
|
Post by deepsea on May 25, 2014 16:24:38 GMT -4
You made a comment about Banks being a Joke but failed to comment about the other Candidates who are white. Are they a joke too or is it just Banks? You need to answer the question. By the way....... Your a little defensive YOU ARE THE ONE THAT PUT BANKS IN THE THREAD? WHY? Because in MY opinion he is a joke. Like I asked you repeatedly, what had he done for anyone here at all? He doesn't come to community events, he doesn't come to schools, he doesn't come to little league function..etc I'm not defensive at all, I just get sick of people playing the race card exactly like YOU immediately did. Nothing more or less How bout you look at merits and not color, something you obviously can't do What about the other white guy (not Gery) Is he pure comedy.
|
|
|
Post by deepsea on May 28, 2014 11:14:46 GMT -4
No Press Release, No Apologies, and No he didn't steal overtime, if he did then there would have been evidence and facts to support the criminal charges that the State's Attorney dismissed! Waiting for that press release "Charges Dropped against Deputy for Allegedly Stealing Overtime" Good luck with that one! Almost right. No press release, no apologies, and no further comment on a personnel issue - as it should be. You forgot to mention that Queen Anne's County acted only after the information was also reviewed by the Caroline County State's Attorney's office which recommended the charges. I know of at least three similar cases (none involving any Sheriff's office) where evidence existed, agreements were made, restitution was paid, and charges were not pursued. I have no knowledge of this case but it is possible that a similar agreement occurred. By the way, welcome back to the forum. Thanks! Its good to be back Bill.
|
|
|
Post by lainey on May 29, 2014 17:06:21 GMT -4
I guess you must have missed him, Orioles Fan. He is very involved in both of his daughters athletics and schools. He has a long and distinguished career as a State Trooper. He rose to leadership position as a Trooper and was in charge of budgets, drug task forces, undercover work and more. His qualifications are NO joke. Now as for the young deputy who was accused of stealing over 10k in pay and benefits over a 2.5 year period, that case was dismissed with prejudice. Simply put, "dismissed with prejudice" means the case is so fatally flawed by the accuser, Hofmann, that it will never proceed. I dont believe he has been reinstated. And this may mean we have another lawsuit coming at us over this issue too. Then there is the 80 million dollar suit for false imprisonment. And then we also have the case where John Hofmann pled guilty to assaulting a fellow female officer. He pled guilty and got a promotion and she lost her job. That is the only joke I see in law enforcement in QAC. Its a sad joke on us taxpayers. Im sick of the joking around. Go Livingston!
|
|
|
Post by deepsea on May 29, 2014 19:25:49 GMT -4
Wow did not know all that.
|
|
|
Post by JJ on May 29, 2014 22:49:48 GMT -4
Get ready Lainey, his KIO defense team on here will be coming to his rescue on this blog! I would like to say that Mr. Banks is a very respectable person. He has been married one time only to his wife of 20 plus years, 2 wonderful daughters, very active in his community, but most of all a man with integrity! THATS RIGHT INTEGRITY! Not like others that will give a run around answer, never had any children, but say they had children, married several times, lies and blows off direct questions about factual current events, violates his own departmental polices and procedures by being involved in another politician's campaign commercial while in uniform and using his County vehicle, ect......
www.banksforsheriff.com/
Very informative and factual!
|
|
|
Post by JJ on May 30, 2014 22:27:01 GMT -4
Consent Decree coming soon to a Sheriff's Office near you!
Please take the time to read this Consent Decree line by line. This document has a profound effect on the future of Queen Annes County, here is the link:
www.dropbox.com/s/3vhjdaze04xyd5a/show_temp-2.pdf
Great Job Sheriff Hofmann!
|
|
|
Post by JJ on May 30, 2014 22:38:11 GMT -4
An Innocent Person Arrested by a Deputy and Jailed for 41 days! 80 Million Dollar Federal Civil Rights Lawsuit as a Result! United States District Court for the District of Maryland: Traee Daran Lee vs. Sheriff Gary Hofmann and the Queen Anne's County Office of the Sheriff
Sexual Assault by a supervisor against a female employee, who the supervisor is the Sheriff's Brother and plead guilty to a crime in the Circuit court of Maryland! United States Department of Justice vs. Sheriff Gary Hofmann. Protecting your brother as the Sheriff after he committed a crime, after you took an oath! That's some real integrity Sheriff!
Great Job Sheriff!
|
|
|
Post by JJ on May 31, 2014 8:15:47 GMT -4
I have just finished reading in detail, the consent decree entered into by Queen Annes County and the United States Department of Justice. www.dropbox.com/s/3vhjdaze04xyd5a/show_temp-2.pdf (Queen Anne's County Consent Decree)
Any person who reads the contents of this document line by line and can possibly vote for Gary Hofmann are in complete denial.
This case is NOT about the sexual assault of an employee. This Decree and Federal investigation is about a total lack of management by Sheriff Hofmann. This case is about elected officials that just kept saying "There is nothing I can do, he's an elected official" This consent decree and its mandates that are very strict and will be monitored by the Federal Government. These mandates are the direct result of incompetence and a failure of those in power to speak out when they knew this was happening. This decree will have a significant affect on future budgets.
Read the decree. Look at it line by line. This is truly a sad day for Queen Anne's County. Please remember that on the heels of this is yet another Federal Civil Rights Case. 80 million in damages requested. False imprisonment. And yet several other law suits are in the works!
Again another great job by Sheriff Hofmann, that's being a real good leader!
|
|
|
Post by JJ on May 31, 2014 19:45:53 GMT -4
Sexual assault case. State of Maryland Case in which Sheriff Hofmann's brother plead guilty. Again, this is a State case. CLOSED
. Federal discrimination case. (11) eleven counts of which the Federal EEOC reviewed and sustained ALL (11) allegations. Enter the Department of Justice
. Department of Justice investigation includes Queen Anne's County AND the Sheriff Office itself.
. Personal cases: Sheriff Hofmann, his brother JD, and his Chief Deputy, Jim Williams are being personally sued for 10.5 Million each.
The Queen Anne's County portion of the Department of Justice case is completed with consent decree. Some points of interest: $620,000 taxpayer dollars for various parts of the case which includes back pay etc. Queen Anne's County human Resources will be under the eye of the Department of Justice for at least 3 years. The decree is extremely detailed and costly to the County. Please read it.
The action or lack thereof regarding the sexual assault case is what brought the EEOC and the Department of Justice to Queen Anne's County. The fact that for over 10 months nothing was done after the victim reported her assault directly to the Sheriff, prompted the Justice Department to intervene.
So what's still out pending?
The Department of Justice is now conducting an investigation into ALL aspects of operations within the Sheriffs Office. Queen Anne's County and the Sheriff as of YESTERDAY, just requested a 2 month delay in that investigation because they are having a hard time gathering the requested "computer evidence" that the DOJ requested.
The difference in the Sheriffs Office investigation by the DOJ is any monitory settlement will come from the State as the Sheriff and Deputies are considered a State Office holder.
The 10.5 million dollar cases against the Sheriff, his brother and Chief Deputy are personal lawsuits that they must deal with. Seeing how the overall complexion of these investigations are going, I'd be worried if I were them.
And unfortunately there is yet another Federal Civil Rights law suit that was re-filed in March against the County, the Sheriff and former Deputy. That case for 80 million dollars revolves around a young man who was incarcerated after a Deputy perjured his testimony. Only after a persistent mother contacted the States Attorney, was video evidenced discovered that showed the wrong person was incarcerated. The Federal Court has already addressed the fact that Sheriff Hofmann knew this potential Deputy had issues with 2 prior police Departments but hired him anyway. Unfortunately those same character issues that were ignored caused this young mans arrest and subsequent false imprisonment.
In my opinion the second case will be much more monetarily devastating to the taxpayer. The County is only insured to 2 million per case.
So, hopefully this will clear a few things up. I too want things to be normal but one thing I am sure of. Putting the Fox back in a Charge of the Hen House is something I will not be doing on June 24th.
Once again great job Sheriff Hofmann!
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 1, 2014 7:30:08 GMT -4
Straight from Mr. Livingston Banks 06/01/14: Good morning everyone,
It has been an eventful week to say the least for my campaign and Queen Annes County.
I continue to be met by new supporters that are excited about my candidacy for Sheriff. Yard sign requests have been strong and again had to obtain several hundred more to fulfill requests.
My wife and I attended several sports events of our daughters and even at those functions were met by new supporters.
On a more serious note, the Consent Decree for Queen Annes County was posted by the United States Department of Justice. The initial cost to Queen Annes County's Taxpayers is $620,000 however, with the full implimentation of its mandates, I believe it will be closer to $700,000 dollars. Of course this is just one half of their investigation as the Sheriff's Office itself continues to be investigated. The consent decree settles the County's portion, the Sheriff's Office investigation and any settlement will be a State taxpayer bill.
Unfortunately the up and coming 2nd Federal lawsuit will be even more devestating to Queen Annes County Taxpayers. The false testimony of a Deputy that never should have been hired, led to an innocent man being arrested and incarcerated. After a persistent mother pressed the States Attorney who again reviewed the case, a video tape that was with held in the trial, showed the Deputy lied. That person is now suing the Sheriff himself, the former Deputy and the our County for 80 Million Dollars.
Ladies and Gentleman simply put, we cannot afford this Sheriff any longer. I respectfully ask for your vote for Sheriff starting on June 12, the early voting start date or on election day June 24th.
Thank you. Livingston
"Community First, It's All About You!"
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 1, 2014 22:10:25 GMT -4
From Mr. Livingston Banks 6/1/14:
The only thing better then today's weather was the reception I received today from citizens.
Quite a few questions have ben asked about the suspicious death of Robin Pope. They wanted to know if I would assist the Maryland State Police in the investigation due to my background in criminal investigations. I promise when elected I will make this one of my priorities. Robin was a dear friend, and my family and I are close to her daughters. I pledge to do what I can to help solve this case.
I also stopped by and spoke to some of our waterman. Being raised on a farm and also working on the water when I was younger, I truly appreciate our waterman. As Sheriff, I will do everything I can to ensure that their work boats are protected from thefts of their equipment. I personally understand the hardship it puts a waterman under when the equipment they rely on to make a living with is stolen.
"Community First, It's All About You!"
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 2, 2014 21:00:41 GMT -4
ONCE AGAIN GREAT LEADERSHIP BY OUR SHERIFF!! County agrees to pay former deputy $620,000! CENTREVILLE — Queen Anne's County will pay $620,000 to settle an employment discrimination lawsuit filed by a former county deputy. The suit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland by former Deputy Kristy Lynn Murphy-Taylor and her husband, Donald Taylor (Kristy Lynn Murphy-Taylor, et ux. v. John Dennis Hofmann, et al., [HASH] 1:12-cv-02521-ELH). The United States intervened in the lawsuit on behalf of Murphy-Taylor in March 2013. The settlement establishes that there is no finding or admission of wrongdoing by the county. Here is the Link to the Star Democrat, record observer, bay times: www.myeasternshoremd.com/news/queen_annes_county/article_83e0448b-109a-5f31-8627-131e4680020a.html
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 2, 2014 21:04:38 GMT -4
And there is total denial about this topic:
As you see below, the US Dept. of Justice does not take many police department misconduct cases.
They are very selective, due to the workload and limited resources they have available.
So Queen Anne’s County Sheriff Hofmann’s actions, inaction and misconduct appeared egregious enough that the US DOJ had to intervene.
Generally, as you read, USDOJ goes after larger police departments, New York City and New Orleans are two of the larger police departments they have investigated in the past. It now appears our sheriff is making history in the wrong way. What a mess.
Department Of Justice Isn't Much Interested In Managing Local Police Reform
By News Staff Created May 29 2014 - 5:00pm
In 1994, Congress passed 42 U.S.C. Section 14141 as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, granting the U.S. attorney general the power to initiate structural reform litigation against local police departments engaged in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional behavior.
It made few headlines but it has been credited as the basis for the Department of Justice to forcefully reform numerous large police departments across the country – including Cincinnati, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, Seattle and Washington, D.C.
Generally, local law enforcement doesn't like federal interference and the federal government doesn't want to try and manage 18,000 police departments, no matter how many laws Congress passes saying it should.
And so it is hamstrung by limited resources, a lack of transparency and "political spillover" at the U.S. Department of Justice, says Stephen Rushin, a law professor at the University of Illinois.
"Historically, the federal government has only initiated an average of three formal investigations under Section 14141 per year," he said.
"And the DOJ has only pursued full-scale reform against an average of about one department per year. There are around 18,000 police departments in the U.S. So it's partly an issue of scale – the Justice Department doesn't have anywhere near as much money, time and people power to truly engage in extensive oversight of all the police departments across the country. They work hard to make the most of the resources they have. But it is a messy and imprecise process.
Rushin says the Department of Justice has unevenly enforced Section 14141. Using interview evidence, he attributes these variations in enforcement to changes in leadership and internal policies, which affected both the breadth and depth of enforcement. In some cases where systemic police misconduct did appear to exist, a phenomenon Rushin calls "political spillover" deterred the d Department from pursuing a case. "As you might expect, politics plays a role in the willingness of the federal government to respond to claims of misconduct in police departments," he said.
"Fighting police misconduct at the federal level is politically contentious. As my evidence shows, during the Clinton administration and Obama administration, the DOJ took on an aggressive posture in fighting police misconduct. During the second half of the Bush administration, they were generally uninterested in using the statute."
Rushin recommends that the Department of Justice adopt a more transparent internal case selection process to create incentives for proactive reform in local police agencies. He also recommends that state and national policymakers seek alternative routes to increase the number of structural police reform cases.
"Combined, those changes could ensure that structural police reform lives up to its potential as a transformative tool for countering police misconduct," he said. Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
|
|
|
Post by jackbquick on Jun 2, 2014 21:21:11 GMT -4
And there is total denial about this topic: As you see below, the US Dept. of Justice does not take many police department misconduct cases. They are very selective, due to the workload and limited resources they have available. So Queen Anne’s County Sheriff Hofmann’s actions, inaction and misconduct appeared egregious enough that the US DOJ had to intervene.Generally, as you read, USDOJ goes after larger police departments, New York City and New Orleans are two of the larger police departments they have investigated in the past. It now appears our sheriff is making history in the wrong way. What a mess. Department Of Justice Isn't Much Interested In Managing Local Police Reform By News Staff Created May 29 2014 - 5:00pm In 1994, Congress passed 42 U.S.C. Section 14141 as part of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act, granting the U.S. attorney general the power to initiate structural reform litigation against local police departments engaged in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional behavior. It made few headlines but it has been credited as the basis for the Department of Justice to forcefully reform numerous large police departments across the country – including Cincinnati, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, Seattle and Washington, D.C. Generally, local law enforcement doesn't like federal interference and the federal government doesn't want to try and manage 18,000 police departments, no matter how many laws Congress passes saying it should. And so it is hamstrung by limited resources, a lack of transparency and "political spillover" at the U.S. Department of Justice, says Stephen Rushin, a law professor at the University of Illinois. "Historically, the federal government has only initiated an average of three formal investigations under Section 14141 per year," he said. "And the DOJ has only pursued full-scale reform against an average of about one department per year. There are around 18,000 police departments in the U.S. So it's partly an issue of scale – the Justice Department doesn't have anywhere near as much money, time and people power to truly engage in extensive oversight of all the police departments across the country. They work hard to make the most of the resources they have. But it is a messy and imprecise process. Rushin says the Department of Justice has unevenly enforced Section 14141. Using interview evidence, he attributes these variations in enforcement to changes in leadership and internal policies, which affected both the breadth and depth of enforcement. In some cases where systemic police misconduct did appear to exist, a phenomenon Rushin calls "political spillover" deterred the d Department from pursuing a case. "As you might expect, politics plays a role in the willingness of the federal government to respond to claims of misconduct in police departments," he said. "Fighting police misconduct at the federal level is politically contentious. As my evidence shows, during the Clinton administration and Obama administration, the DOJ took on an aggressive posture in fighting police misconduct. During the second half of the Bush administration, they were generally uninterested in using the statute." Rushin recommends that the Department of Justice adopt a more transparent internal case selection process to create incentives for proactive reform in local police agencies. He also recommends that state and national policymakers seek alternative routes to increase the number of structural police reform cases. "Combined, those changes could ensure that structural police reform lives up to its potential as a transformative tool for countering police misconduct," he said. Source: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Let me guess. JJ is your handle but Banks is your last name. Good Grief! Or you are his secret lover.
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 2, 2014 21:34:16 GMT -4
Wow Jack! Such kind and friendly words, could your last name begin with H?? its sad to say, but arrogance, ignorance, stupidity, and lack of leadership is the problem with this current administration. Ask yourself, if it was your daughter, mother or sister that was sexually assaulted by the sheriff's brother and he just blows it off and covers for his brother and now over $600k later of Queen Anne's County Tax payer's money is blown away, what would you think? Please ask our current sheriff to talk about this current topic, but wait another 80 million dollar lawsuit is on the horizon! Also ask yourself if you or a member of your family was incarcerated after a deputy lied about a false arrest and they spend 41 days in jail, would you be happy??
Facts don't lie and that's a fact Jack!
|
|