|
Post by Watch Dog on Feb 10, 2006 18:01:36 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by Paul on Feb 11, 2006 19:28:50 GMT -4
Is this really necessary?
|
|
|
Post by Sarah on Feb 16, 2006 13:02:27 GMT -4
Yes - I'm glad it was posted. Maybe it will discourage some other sicko from hurting someone if they know the public embarassment will follow them for the rest of their lives. If I were a parent - I would want to know about this guy in my neighborhood.
Thanks watchdog.
|
|
|
Post by uvrays on Feb 16, 2006 16:22:32 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Feb 16, 2006 22:45:06 GMT -4
Is this really necessary? it's a no for me, there's a site just for that, If you really want to do something, get the laws changed to keep them locked up, or electronically tracked- as long as they are out.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Feb 17, 2006 11:30:56 GMT -4
Here's a site where you can see the faces and names of the sex offenders that live & work in your area: www.familywatchdog.us. I think it is good for a community to be informed of the dangerous people living near them, especially those with children. Why do people feel the need to protect criminals? We need to protect ourselves!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Feb 17, 2006 12:34:56 GMT -4
Don't get me wrong, I'll never defend or protect a pervert, no way. I just don't need it thrown in my face everywhere I go.
Lock 'em up, KEEP 'em locked up! And there would be no need for a list, a law, or a website for sex offenders who are out....
it say's above that he's not at his registered address, I'm SURE that there's a better place or another way to get him the attention he deserved-(locked up for not changing his address)
KEEP THEM IN JAIL, PROBLEM SOLVED.
IF they killed in their crime, give them the needle, If they get out, they will probably do it again.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Feb 17, 2006 16:24:51 GMT -4
I totally agree, keep them in jail. Unfortunately, our system is putting them back into society. Until the system changes, I feel more comfortable knowing that there are ways in which we can find out when one is let loose in our community. Whether it be someone posting it on this site or seeing it on one of the other websites mentioned.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Feb 19, 2006 19:00:53 GMT -4
I totally agree, keep them in jail. Unfortunately, our system is putting them back into society. Until the system changes, AND THE SYSTEM WILL NOT CHANGE UNTIL- We VOTE OUT the stupid LIBERAL Politicians who pass stupid laws. Check into the LIBERAL Voting bills up this year to soften the voting laws, How about FELONS Voting?. WE= Me, You, and every other LEGAL U.S. Resident, registered VOTOR WE are the system, WE ALL just don't know it, or don;t want to know it.
|
|
|
Post by Jen on Feb 20, 2006 18:01:35 GMT -4
Again, I totally agree. I do vote against the politicians you are referring to. I know exactly what I need to do as a voter. Why would I complain about something if I wasn't doing my part to eradicate it? You bring up a good point though - I'm sure there are a lot of people out there who feel the same way we do, but don't vote because they think it won't make a difference. Sad.
|
|
|
Post by Pam on Feb 21, 2006 9:55:41 GMT -4
Unfortuntely it is becoming more and more clear that neither party is working for the average 'down the middle' citizen. The liberals/Democrats are only working for the poor, minorities, and apparently criminals now. The 'conservatives'/Republicans seem to be a bunch of religious kooks trying to convert everyone and sensor everything, and only working for the very wealthy. Not much to vote for unfortunately.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Feb 22, 2006 19:45:55 GMT -4
Pam, I don't think either party is working for any of the people anymore.
It seems like it's all about being the party in power, and staying in power.
The party that isn't in power, will do ANYTHING to get back in power. No matter what the cost.
|
|
|
Post by Rick on Feb 22, 2006 22:27:08 GMT -4
bchevy, I couldn't agree more. On the national scale both parties have manipulated the media into pitting citizens against each other, when both parties are pretty much the same. Yeah, 'W' is a horrible president, but so was Clinton, and so was Bush Sr., and if you really look at Reagan, not so good either. State gov't is the same. Ehrlich has been a nothing governor, Glendening was useless, O'Malley will likely be the next gov and his Baltimore record is a joke, etc. That's why it seems so important to get a good local government in place. They seem to sometimes actually care.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Feb 28, 2006 14:07:08 GMT -4
Yeah, 'W' is a horrible president, quote] All I know is, the alternative to "W" was way more scary to me, both times. The Dem. party should be embarrased to have put up a self confessed war criminal" and the country should be more embarrased for getting him that close to the White House. the last 2 Dems to run for pres. were changing their lines weekly, I'm glad it didn't work, and no, I'm not a republican. It's just amazing to me how anti people all the politicians are, and how hungry the Dems are to get back in power, and doing ANYTHING to get it, including fals accusations, bashing the pres. and the war (that most voted for) that in turns bashes the troops. You can't be against the war and for the troops, I don't get that thinking.
|
|
|
Post by Pat on Feb 28, 2006 15:15:33 GMT -4
I think that you can be against the war and for the troops. The message that this administration has successfully pushed through the media might say different, but not so. I think that this 'war' was a horrible idea and that it was / is based on lies and false information. I think that we should never have went in there, but - We're there now. That said, I want our military people to get through this unscathed and for this to be over as quickly as possible. I didn't and don't support the decision to invade another non-threatening country, but I do support the troops in that they now need to help build up the 'good guys' and get the hell out of there safely. Unfortunately, Iraq will never be a 'friendly' country to us as we are the great Satan / infidels to Muslims, which is why this 'war' was a really stupid idea.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Feb 28, 2006 18:08:37 GMT -4
So you would rather fight "them" on our soil? They started it, we should end it, Win it, and we can. Unfortunately Congress wont allow it to be won.....
remember the tv press is way lopsided in it's coverage and we don't get all the facts, just what the tv press wants us to get.
How soon we forget
|
|
|
Post by Alex L on Mar 1, 2006 13:26:29 GMT -4
I work for the TV press. The whole "press is biased" think is a load of crap. Most of the news orginizations are owned by corperate America (GE owns NBC, Westinghouse owns CBS, etc) and those corperations make money from war. GE is a great example.
As far as this war goes, Iraq didn't start anything. I agreed with leveling Afghanistan, but to say Iraq was a threat is a joke. There wasn't any connection between the two countries. The media (most of it) is simply reporting what they can. This administration has done a very good job at steering the press and convincing the public that the press is against them.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Mar 2, 2006 8:04:32 GMT -4
THE PRESS has done a very good job at convincing me that they don't give the whole story. They report what they want, when they want, and how they want it.
AS for the reasons,,, it needed done. Hopefully it will get DONE. Sadaam supported terrorism with his money and power -he can't now. The ONLY way to have peace over there is for this "faction" to be wiped out.
Go interview some soldiers that wer, or are there. ASK THEM WHAT THEY THINK, and put it on the evening news, (put ALL of it on the evening news- not the ones you select)
All I hear is now many soldiers are killed, have you ever reported how many terrorists were killed? You make it sound like our soldiers are the only ones dieing, and they're always walking into traps.
If this press was around during WWII we would not have been able to win.
|
|
|
Post by Alex L on Mar 2, 2006 9:31:27 GMT -4
It sounds like you have bought the 'W' lies hook, line & sinker. Sorry to hear that and nothing personal. We report anything that we can, simply put. We have restrictions placed on us on where we can go and what we can say due to 'national security', etc., that we have never had before. We are (I'm stateside, so not so much 'me' in the 'we' thank God) also not reporting on the thousands of civilians that are killed each day over there too. We don't have full access to the correct stats and the few bones that are thrown our way are being dangled by our 'leaders' in front of us with the threat of them being taken away if we go too deep. Also, Saddam wasn't nearly the threat that the current state of Iraq is to everyone now. Saddam had no ties to Al Queda and that was the reason that we invaded that country. The whole thing is and was a sham.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Mar 3, 2006 16:44:20 GMT -4
I've bought nothing, I see what I see, and read what I read. it's in print and on the news, 1/2 the story.
You guys have a LOT more freedom than you've ever had, remember when the press got the news from the "war dept.", or it had to be approved by them? I kinda think it should go back to that during a war.
If you can't understand that everything can't be published due to security something's wrong.
|
|
|
Post by Alex L on Mar 4, 2006 17:07:17 GMT -4
Wow. I'm a strong believer in an educated public. We are the government, something that the current chief seems to have forgotten. I'll just stop here.
|
|
|
Post by JoeShmoe on Apr 27, 2006 18:15:29 GMT -4
I work at skyrocket support, and I know him personally. DO you not feel people can change, I've bet everyone of you has done something wrong in your life. Should i treat you like dirt becuase of it. No, so untill you meet him , don't judge. People can change, and people do change. So like I said, don't judge untill you meet him.
k thanks
|
|
newbie
First Time Poster
Posts: 0
|
Post by newbie on Apr 30, 2006 10:39:00 GMT -4
:-/I agree that we've all done something wrong in our lives, but I think the issue that started this forum in the first place is that, grown/older men have no right to go after children, and being that KI is continually growing with new families, it's providing them a warning as to the kinds of people that are living next to us. Plus, no one on here is treating him "like dirt" or judging this person. Give them the opportunity to meet him, like you said, and maybe they would, but someone was taking a precautionary step.
|
|
|
Post by J38 on Apr 30, 2006 17:30:43 GMT -4
Thank you so much for posting this information. I work in the business park and have dealt with this man many times. He always creeped me out, but I never knew his background until now. People need to know this information so that they can protect themselves from these people who, in my opinion, can never be rehabilitated.
|
|
|
Post by ljp on Jul 15, 2006 22:46:38 GMT -4
government schmovernment.... the point is that this isn't the forum for things of that nature. I am all for protecting our children from sexual deviants, but these days people get convicted of such crimes for picking up a girl in a bar who is 13 but has a 21 year old ID. As much as I agree that they shouldn't be picking up strangers in a bar, we shouldn't judge without having all of the information. I for one have been doing business with this man for a few months and didn't know about his past until seeing his picture just now. Now, I am not going to be able to look at him the same again, and I don't know the situation. That is unfortunate for him...
|
|