|
Post by hisea on Feb 13, 2013 12:00:45 GMT -4
Dorner manhunt: Charred human remains found in burned cabin. Charred human remains have been found in the burned cabin where police believe fugitive ex-cop Christopher Dorner was holed up after trading gunfire with law enforcement, authorities said. If the body is identified to be Dorner’s, the standoff would end a weeklong manhunt for the ex-LAPD officer and Navy Reserve lieutenant who is believed to be responsible for a string of revenge-fueled shootings following his firing by the Los Angeles Police Department several years ago. Four people have died, allegedly at Dorner’s hands. The latest burst of gunfire Tuesday came after the suspect, attempting to flee law enforcement officials, shot to death a San Bernardino County sheriff’s deputy and seriously injured another, officials said. He then barricaded himself in a wooden cabin outside Big Bear, not far from ski resorts in the snow-capped San Bernardino Mountains east of Los Angeles, according to police. latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2013/02/dorner-manhunt-charred-human-remains-found-in-burned-cabin.html
|
|
|
Post by alleycat on Feb 13, 2013 12:49:34 GMT -4
What??
|
|
|
Post by lainey on Feb 14, 2013 9:21:42 GMT -4
And this makes him a liberal?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2013 10:25:42 GMT -4
There are some people on here that are just that delusional!
|
|
|
Post by jake on Feb 14, 2013 11:36:08 GMT -4
LOL,
Left wing NUT! I enjoy the irony.
funny how many don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by hisea on Feb 14, 2013 13:51:28 GMT -4
Supports gun control but uses a weapon to kill four people with. Voted for barry soetoro(barack obama) and agrees with Sen. Feinstein. Finally he finds fault with everyone but himself and feels justified in his actions.
Now tell me if that isn't a typical liberal.
|
|
|
Post by lainey on Feb 14, 2013 19:48:26 GMT -4
I don't know who that crazy man voted for. Or his thoughts on gun control. And I guess I don't see the humor either.
|
|
|
Post by topfish on Feb 14, 2013 19:56:54 GMT -4
Deep Sea, this might help: An antipsychotic such as clozapine, loxapine, olanzapine or quetiapine would be indicated Paranoia is usually treated with antipsychotic drugs which have a tranquillising effect and aim to reduce paranoid feelings. Other forms of treatment are known as talking treatments; these include counselling, cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and psychotherapy. If a person is very distressed, they may be admitted to hospital for treatment. People are usually encouraged to go to hospital as voluntary patients, but sometimes if someone's behaviour is very disturbed, they can be admitted to hospital against their will under the Mental Health Act 1983. The atypical antipsychotic agents, sometimes called the "novel" antipsychotic agents are a group of drugs which are different chemically from the older drugs used to treat psychosis. The "conventional" antipsychotic drugs are classified by their chemical structures as the phenothiazines, thioxanthines (which are chemically very similar to the phenothiazines), butyrophenones, diphenylbutylpiperadines and the indolones. All of the atypical antipsychotic agents are chemically classified as dibenzepines. They are considered atypical or novel because they have different side effects from the conventional antipsychotic agents. The atypical drugs are far less likely to cause extra-pyrammidal side-effects(EPS), drug induced involuntary movements, than are the older drugs. The atypical antipsychotic drugs may also be effective in some cases that are resistant to older drugs. The drugs in this group are clozapine (Clozaril), loxapine (Loxitane), olanzapine (Zyprexa), and quetiapine (Seroquel). Purpose The antipsychotic drugs are used to treat severe emotional disorders. Although there may be different names for these disorders, depending on severity and how long the symptoms last, psychotic disorders all cause at least one of the following symptoms: * delusions * hallucinations * disorganized speech * grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior Loxapine has also been used to treat anxiety with mental depression. Recommended dosage The recommended dose depends on the drug, the patient, and the condition being treated. The normal practice is to start each patient at a low dose, and gradually increase the dose until a satisfactory response is achieved. The odse should be held at the lowest level that gives satisfactory results. Clozapine usually requires doses between 300 and 600 milligrams a day, but some people require as much as 900 milligrams/day. Doses higher than 900 millgrams/day are not recommended. Loxapine is usually effective at doses of 60-100 milligrams/day, but may be used in doses as high as 250 mg/day if needed. Olanzapine doses vary with the condition being treated. The usual maximum dose is 20 milligrams/day. Quetiapine may be dosed anywhere from 150-750 milligrams/day, depending on how well the patient responds. Sources: www.thesite.org.uk/healthandwellbeing/mentalhealth/otherconditions/paranoiaEddieNygma 74 months ago Comments on this question: littlebear said: 1 I doubt anyone is paying attention to this answer because it was posted 16 months ago but the class of atypical antipsychotics are zyprexa, clozapine, Seroquel, Risperdal, Geodon, and Abilify there arn't anyothers. There are conventional antipsychichotics as well. they all treat paranoia it is just about finding the one that is affective for you 55 months ago kfb424 replied to post #1: 2 Spouse took all of those meds & was gradually able to taper off. It was almost 2 years before things became more "normal". It doesn't look as if he'll ever be completely relieved of the paranoia but we learned he has sleep apnea. Now that that is being treated (CPAP) & he's better rested he is less anxious.
|
|
|
Post by RobMoore on Feb 14, 2013 20:05:14 GMT -4
BTW, Deep sea is right. Go take your own meds, just be careful. Some of them have been known to cause people to go on killing sprees.
|
|
|
Post by hisea on Feb 15, 2013 7:16:58 GMT -4
Missouri Democrats Introduce Legislation to Confiscate Firearms – Gives Gun Owners 90 Days to Turn in Weapons Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed. Dana Loesch Radio reported on the new legislation being pushed by Missouri Democrats: Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution. Here’s part of the Democratic proposal in Missouri: 4. Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law, was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large capacity magazine shall have ninety days from such effective date to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution: (1) Remove the assault weapon or large capacity magazine from the state of Missouri; (2) Render the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or (3) Surrender the assault weapon or large capacity magazine to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruction, subject to specific agency regulations. 5. Unlawful manufacture, import, possession, purchase, sale, or transfer of an assault weapon or a large capacity magazine is a class C felony. www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/missouri-democrats-intruduce-legislation-to-confiscate-firearms-gives-gunowners-90-days-to-turn-in-guns/This is not a barry seotoro approved site!
|
|
|
Post by Frank on Feb 15, 2013 9:10:04 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by georgej202 on Feb 15, 2013 22:52:51 GMT -4
Frank has really hit on the crux of the 2nd amendment. The thought of our 4 fathers was to give us the ability to defend ourselves from a tyrannical government. In the time of Thomas Jefferson the musket was the weapon of choice, which was also used by the military. Today the government uses many weapons. Why not allow the people to have the same advantage.
No person in our history spoke on the freedom of its people then Thomas Jefferson. His many quotes quantify the thoughts behind the 2nd amendment.
To quote just a few of his thoughts:
“No freeman shall be debarred the use of arms.” “A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference. “
“Experience hath shown, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny. “
“For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.”
As stated above his thoughts of a militia was the people and has nothing to do with the government. I suggest for those, who regard the constitution as a fluid document which requires change with the times, read the thoughts of the people who wrote the constitution and bill of rights may help you understand why this country has survived 200+ years
George
|
|
|
Post by speedergurl68 on Feb 16, 2013 8:31:22 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by bluecrabber on Feb 16, 2013 11:48:40 GMT -4
“For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.” This is an important reference. In Jefferson's day Militia meant an armed civilian force. Had nothing to do with the military or army. Many people today have tried to interpret Militia to mean the armed services of the Government, eg. Army Reserve and National Guard. Hogwash.
|
|
|
Post by georgej202 on Feb 17, 2013 19:50:11 GMT -4
Only if it was edited by CNBC George
|
|