|
Post by zeus911 on Oct 20, 2010 9:33:11 GMT -4
I opened up the Bay Times this morning and was actually intrigued on the article for Pete Richter. I personally, am not big on Pete's different rants on this forum, but the Bay Times article did give me insight into Pete as a Sheriff. All of the ideas he outlined, much to my amazement, I agree 100% with all of them.
Pete - I wish you would have laid out your agenda as Sheriff earlier on in the process, because I am sure more people would be on board.
The page opposite of Pete is an article on Sheriff Hoffman. That article does a good job pointing out qualifications and what he has done in the past, but did not outline a direction in the future. Not sure if it was the way the article was written, or he does not have a plan for the future and just keep things the way they are.
|
|
|
Post by stephadele on Oct 20, 2010 14:24:03 GMT -4
This is a prime example of what happens when people attack and personalize their baggage here instead of asking questions and finding out about the candidates honestly...Often, amazingly, many find that they agree alot with their so called "opponent".
|
|
|
Post by nightpurse99 on Oct 20, 2010 19:22:17 GMT -4
I hope he does well
|
|
|
Post by darknight on Oct 27, 2010 23:50:41 GMT -4
|
|