|
Post by JJ on Jun 23, 2014 20:40:30 GMT -4
This sounds shady to me and the fact that it comes out from Sheriff Hofmann and his office on Election Eve!
Little suspect of this post as there is no Court finding to go along with it. Sheriff Gary Hofmann, please post the Court ruling.
Sheriff Gary Hofmann 3 hours ago UPDATE:
Case [HASH] 1:13-CV-00672-RDB Lee v. Sheriff Gary Hofmann, et al $80M
The Queen Anne’s County Office of the Sheriff is announcing that the parties have agreed and are in the process of preparing a release and discharge from a lawsuit pertaining to allegations against a former deputy arising from a traffic stop and citations on March 4, 2010. The former deputy was investigated, suspended and consequently separated from employment after allegations were brought forward to the Sheriff in 2010. Additionally, there were no findings of any wrongdoing or liability by the Sheriff.
"I was confident all along we handled the actions committed by the former employee appropriately” said Sheriff Hofmann. “Contrary to information being posted on election social media sites by a few regarding this lawsuit, it’s over. People have been told this lawsuit was going to cost the taxpayers tens of millions of dollars which is truly a disservice to the community and just an attempt to sway votes.”
|
|
|
Post by KITransplant on Jun 23, 2014 20:40:50 GMT -4
No spin on my part. If there is any spin (whether accidental or not), it is to say that the court "sided" with Mr. Lee's version of the facts. It didn't. That being said, Mr. Lee's version may be 100 percent accurate. I am not saying they are, or aren't. I simply don't know. Is this better? Mr Lee was held for 40+ days for a crime he didn't commit by our Sheriff Department (and was proven by dash cam, along with the fact that Deputy Johnson was fired). That alone should be enough to give you the warm fuzzys. Not really. It's still the plaintiff's version of the facts. The court was accepting the facts alleged by the plaintiff as true for purposes of the motion to dismiss before it. The plaintiff's version of the facts do, in fact, disturb me, but at the same time, we don't know the full story. That's my only point.
|
|
|
Post by KITransplant on Jun 23, 2014 20:47:26 GMT -4
This sounds shady to me and the fact that it comes out from Sheriff Hofmann and his office on Election Eve! Little suspect of this post as there is no Court finding to go along with it. Sheriff Gary Hofmann, please post the Court ruling. Sheriff Gary Hofmann 3 hours ago UPDATE: Case [HASH] 1:13-CV-00672-RDB Lee v. Sheriff Gary Hofmann, et al $80M The Queen Anne’s County Office of the Sheriff is announcing that the parties have agreed and are in the process of preparing a release and discharge from a lawsuit pertaining to allegations against a former deputy arising from a traffic stop and citations on March 4, 2010. The former deputy was investigated, suspended and consequently separated from employment after allegations were brought forward to the Sheriff in 2010. Additionally, there were no findings of any wrongdoing or liability by the Sheriff. "I was confident all along we handled the actions committed by the former employee appropriately” said Sheriff Hofmann. “Contrary to information being posted on election social media sites by a few regarding this lawsuit, it’s over. People have been told this lawsuit was going to cost the taxpayers tens of millions of dollars which is truly a disservice to the community and just an attempt to sway votes.” Where was it posted?
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 23, 2014 20:55:17 GMT -4
If you do not want anymore smoke and mirrors VOTE for either Livingston Banks or Kevin Rhoades for Sheriff!
|
|
|
Post by frankf on Jun 23, 2014 21:01:54 GMT -4
Is this better? Mr Lee was held for 40+ days for a crime he didn't commit by our Sheriff Department (and was proven by dash cam, along with the fact that Deputy Johnson was fired). That alone should be enough to give you the warm fuzzys. Not really. It's still the plaintiff's version of the facts. The court was accepting the facts alleged by the plaintiff as true for purposes of the motion to dismiss before it. The plaintiff's version of the facts do, in fact, disturb me, but at the same time, we don't know the full story. That's my only point. Dash cam showed that the plaintiff was not doing as the Deputy stated. The plaintiff was held for 40+ days and never prosecuted. Now we, as taxpayers get to pay for the defense of the Sheriff in this action, and the previous settlement. That's my point. Time for a change.
|
|
|
Post by frankf on Jun 23, 2014 21:02:35 GMT -4
This sounds shady to me and the fact that it comes out from Sheriff Hofmann and his office on Election Eve! Little suspect of this post as there is no Court finding to go along with it. Sheriff Gary Hofmann, please post the Court ruling. Sheriff Gary Hofmann 3 hours ago UPDATE: Case [HASH] 1:13-CV-00672-RDB Lee v. Sheriff Gary Hofmann, et al $80M The Queen Anne’s County Office of the Sheriff is announcing that the parties have agreed and are in the process of preparing a release and discharge from a lawsuit pertaining to allegations against a former deputy arising from a traffic stop and citations on March 4, 2010. The former deputy was investigated, suspended and consequently separated from employment after allegations were brought forward to the Sheriff in 2010. Additionally, there were no findings of any wrongdoing or liability by the Sheriff. "I was confident all along we handled the actions committed by the former employee appropriately” said Sheriff Hofmann. “Contrary to information being posted on election social media sites by a few regarding this lawsuit, it’s over. People have been told this lawsuit was going to cost the taxpayers tens of millions of dollars which is truly a disservice to the community and just an attempt to sway votes.” Where was it posted? It was posted on Facebook.
|
|
|
Post by KITransplant on Jun 23, 2014 21:03:15 GMT -4
But if you want just smoke, vote for Heather Mizeur in the Governor's race.
|
|
|
Post by frankf on Jun 23, 2014 21:03:27 GMT -4
|
|
|
Post by KITransplant on Jun 23, 2014 21:05:13 GMT -4
It was posted on Facebook. Well, I agree that the timing is interesting.
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 23, 2014 22:00:37 GMT -4
Statement just released by Mr. Banks:
UPDATE:
Federal Civil Rights Case [HASH]1:13-cv-00672-RDB Lee vs. Sheriff Gary Hofmann et al $80 Million
At approximately 3:00 pm today June 23rd, Sheriff Hofmann released an Official Statement indicating that the case involving himself and Mr. Lee had been settled and there were no findings of "wrong doing" on his part.
As many of you have seen posted on Facebook, there is absolutely no record of any agreement between Mr. Lee, the Sheriff or Queen Anne's County contained in any Federal record.
In the interest of finding the truth, I contacted Mr. Lee and his mother. Mr. Lee stated he has not seen nor signed any agreement, he is not going to sign any settlement agreement.
I advised Mr. Lee and his mother that the Sheriff had made a statement hours earlier that the case had been dismissed. At this point Mr. Lee while in my and his mothers presence made a call to his counsel and emphasized to them that there is NO AGREEMENT.
Ladies and Gentleman of Queen Anne's County hopefully this will be the last attempt by Gary Hofmann to be "less than honest" with the citizens of Queen Anne's County. Enough is enough.
Please cast your vote for me, Livingston Banks for Sheriff tomorrow. You deserve Honesty and Integrity in your Sheriffs Office.
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 23, 2014 22:09:49 GMT -4
I rest my case, there you have it folks, what a liar Sheriff R. G. Hofmann is. What a true disgrace to Queen Anne's County. Sheriff Hofmann should just save face now and just resign! Sounds like a false police report that is a termination charge under the Sheriff's Office departmental policy and procedures manual!
|
|
|
Post by KITransplant on Jun 23, 2014 22:39:34 GMT -4
Ok, does anyone have an actual link to the Facebook page in question? I've looked at the Sheriff's Facebook page and I don't see this anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by frankf on Jun 23, 2014 22:54:38 GMT -4
Ok, does anyone have an actual link to the Facebook page in question? I've looked at the Sheriff's Facebook page and I don't see this anywhere. Search "Sheriff Gary Hofmann" in FB. He has a couple of pages. Presumably departmental and his "personal" pages.
|
|
|
Post by KITransplant on Jun 23, 2014 23:01:18 GMT -4
Ok, does anyone have an actual link to the Facebook page in question? I've looked at the Sheriff's Facebook page and I don't see this anywhere. Search "Sheriff Gary Hofmann" in FB. Ok. I found it this time. He's got a couple of pages apparently. Thanks and good night.
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on Jun 24, 2014 2:34:30 GMT -4
So banks contacted the mom and son and then went to their house to make more phone calls supposedly?
Did I read that correctly?
I guess we shall see what the AG has to say huh
And JJ I suggest you research the definition of a false police report because his statement isn't a police report to begin with
Good try though
|
|
|
Post by deepsea on Jun 24, 2014 7:28:05 GMT -4
Not a SMIDGEN of trust for Queen Ann's County Sheriff and his friend Steve Wilson of Conquest Beach.
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on Jun 24, 2014 7:30:51 GMT -4
Close thread and go vote. Doesn't matter anymore
|
|
|
Post by bluecrabber on Jun 24, 2014 8:23:52 GMT -4
And Banks continues to claim with full page ads he is not a mudslinger. All he has talked about is Hoffman. Stuff happens when you are running a busy Sheriff office in a rural area. I have not seen nor read (with any factual credibility) of personal wrongdoings by Sheriff Hoffman. I think he has handled some difficult situations professionally and with concern not only for the office, but the County. Seems pretty obvious to me that there are a couple of very active social media types with an axe to grind. I wonder why? The squeakiest wheels are usually the ones without oil.
|
|
|
Post by harleyd on Jun 24, 2014 10:22:57 GMT -4
In my opinion, a cop is supposed to have the highest level of integrity. That being said, having affairs and screwing around with other peoples wives and cops under your command is a billboard that says "I have a serious lack of integrity". The same goes with being honest. I also think that having such a high position in any police or sheriff department should be earned, not elected or appointed. This would cut out the political favors. We don't need a politician to be sheriff, we need a real cop. There should also be term limits. Vote for who you will. Vote on their record, their accomplishments and their integrity. Making people aware of their opponents documented and confirmed instances of lack of integrity and dishonesty is not mudslinging. BTW, there are several deputies that oppose the re-election of the current sheriff. The will not say it publicly or outside of their circles due to repercussions by the bosses. Like I stated before. I personally think that the current Sheriff will stay in office because is so well known. I personally think it's time for a change. Just go vote.
|
|
|
Post by deepsea on Jun 24, 2014 10:42:19 GMT -4
Close thread and go vote. Doesn't matter anymore Canceled your vote!
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 24, 2014 10:56:27 GMT -4
By Banks for Sheriff
VOTE LIVINGSTON BANKS FOR SHERIFF
Today is election day. I feel I've done all I can to convince the citizens of Queen Anne's County that it's time for positive change. I feel good about the way I've run my campaign. I believe I ran a clean campaign, and I believe that putting the truth out there was the right thing to do. I am sorry if some people did not agree with my approach, or with my "investigation" yesterday. As career veteran in law enforcement, my training has always led me to follow up and verify the truth. That is what my instincts led me to do due to the fact that Sheriff Hoffman posted no documentation when he released his statement yesterday.
I hope everyone takes the time today to vote. As I am sure all of Queen Anne's County is aware at this point, your vote will make a difference in the future of our county. I look forward to helping build a brighter future for you, your children and our community.
Community First, It's All About You!
VOTE LIVINGSTON BANKS FOR SHERIFF
|
|
|
Post by JJ on Jun 24, 2014 11:00:10 GMT -4
As one who does not take the word of the sheriff without double checking, the Atty. General's Office of Md was contacted today. Seems no one can find anything on a settlement, a message was left to be contacted by the Attorney representing our sheriff as to whether there is in fact an actual settlement.
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on Jun 24, 2014 11:13:51 GMT -4
In my opinion, a cop is supposed to have the highest level of integrity. That being said, having affairs and screwing around with other peoples wives and cops under your command is a billboard that says "I have a serious lack of integrity". The same goes with being honest. I also think that having such a high position in any police or sheriff department should be earned, not elected or appointed. This would cut out the political favors. We don't need a politician to be sheriff, we need a real cop. There should also be term limits. Vote for who you will. Vote on their record, their accomplishments and their integrity. Making people aware of their opponents documented and confirmed instances of lack of integrity and dishonesty is not mudslinging. BTW, there are several deputies that oppose the re-election of the current sheriff. The will not say it publicly or outside of their circles due to repercussions by the bosses. Like I stated before. I personally think that the current Sheriff will stay in office because is so well known. I personally think it's time for a change. Just go vote. I would def like to hear more about what you were claiming. I'm curious as to why it wasn't put out by anyone. Obviously it raises issues assuming it's all valid
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on Jun 24, 2014 11:14:15 GMT -4
Close thread and go vote. Doesn't matter anymore Canceled your vote! Son of a Censored Bad Word Here. Haha
|
|
|
Post by oriolesfan on Jun 24, 2014 11:16:20 GMT -4
As one who does not take the word of the sheriff without double checking, the Atty. General's Office of Md was contacted today. Seems no one can find anything on a settlement, a message was left to be contacted by the Attorney representing our sheriff as to whether there is in fact an actual settlement. Well I don't believe Banks talked to the Lees either. One sentence he contacted them. Next sentence he was in their presence for calls yet he won't answer if he actually went to their house
|
|