|
Post by Betty Broom on Nov 2, 2006 8:43:21 GMT -4
To Guest To all Hofmann campaign supporters please sweep your own doorstep clean before throwing mud on Mr. Rhodes doorstep it may get you very muddy !
|
|
|
Post by Inside Deputy on Nov 2, 2006 9:31:03 GMT -4
to wutashow to answer your question on where has Sheriff Crossley and Chief Benton been? The morning of the raids both were at the pre raid briefing and Chief Deputy Benton was on the scene of the TTT raid the entire time. Hope that answers your questions. HHMMMM!!!
|
|
Nothing but the facts
Guest
|
Post by Nothing but the facts on Nov 2, 2006 21:55:15 GMT -4
Falger25: Your missing the whole point to this issue. It's a matter of integrity, ethics and judgment. No one here is saying that the truck stop is not allowed to participate in the election process. They have every right to support which candidate they want for sheriff and display all the signs in the world. Heck the truck stop can offer thousands of dollars to any candidate they want But does not mean that the candidate has to except that contribution. Mr. Hofmann could of very easily declined the monetary offer made by the truck stop. But he chose not too. Mr. Hofmann could of thanked the truck stop and not taken the money. It is a very poor decision for any candidate running for office to except money from a business KNOWING they were and still currently under federal investigation for money related crimes. Not a smart thing to do. There is some issues there and it's a big problem. The truck stop is in know way out of the woods on this and they can still be criminally charged and they may be. I can assure you that the investigation is not closed and you were given wrong information that it was. If the truck stop is clear and free as you say then answer me this. After the 15 slot machines were seized by the sheriff's department, has the truck stop been given back the machines as of this date. If they are cleared of all wrong doings then you have to return all seized property. Was the machines given back to the truck stop or owners. was the truck stop given back there thousands of dollars that was seized by the sheriff's department. By law you have to give the money back to the business if they are cleared of all wrong doings. Was the thousands of dollars given back to the truck stop. I already know the answer to both but I will let you do your homework and find out yourself. The federal investigation is still open and anyone tells your different they do not have the facts straight. Talk with the States Attorneys Office. They won't tell you about the case but they will tell you it is still under federal investigation and may be for years. The sheriff's office is going to get a very nice piece of the action on the money somewhere in the millions.
|
|
|
Post by Old Timer on Nov 3, 2006 6:45:39 GMT -4
Sounds like Earl Beville is writing all these negative comments about the truck stop machines. I believe thats why he lost to Sgt. Gary Hoffman in the primary.......Hellow, every bar, American Legion, Moose, V.F.W. with a poker machine pays off. We all know this, and who really cares. The state is in the Lottery business. Bingo in the churches. Money wheels for fund raisers. Scratch offs in every 7-11. Betting at the race tracks. etc. etc. etc.. I received a flier in the mail today with Mr. Charlie Rhodes pictured with his four brothers. All law enforcement officers in uniform, and everyone a supervisor. What have these men done to make our society safer. Has anyone of the men ticketed a illegally speeding police cruiser, or one parked in violation? Voiced their opinion for the citizens being illegally stopped, and searched by their fellow law enforcement friends? I don't think so. I'm an old man who has been watching the crime getting worse by the day. My friends granddaughter is hooked on heroin. Her introduction to drugs was in the Kent Island High School. She says drugs are everywhere in Q.A.Co.. The kids can buy any drug they want without a problem. I want to hear what these candidates are going to do to save our children. Tell us how you're going to fight the growing crime rate in general. What do they think about road blocks for seatbelt violations, red light cameras, sobriety road blocks. I was taught in school that you were innocent until proven guilty, and the burden of proof was on the accuser. Many of the folks in my generation are disgusted with law enforcement in general. Get off this negative sissy school yard way of politicking. Tell us what your going to do, specifically, to fight the growing crime problem in our county.
|
|
|
Post by falgar25 on Nov 3, 2006 7:03:13 GMT -4
... If the truck stop is clear and free as you say then answer me this. After the 15 slot machines were seized by the sheriff's department, has the truck stop been given back the machines as of this date. ... "Nothing but the facts": You seem to have more questiions than facts. 1. I'm certainly not going to try to explain the (lack of) logic behind the way the Sheriff's Dept. works, especially where money is involved. 2. My guess is that the machines were not owned by the truckstop. My guess is they were being leased from a business, maybe a VA business, and were officially sieized from them. 3. If the machines were officially seized from another business, then perhaps the truckstop had nothing to do with the illegal activity. Sure, the machines were in their building, but perhaps they didn't control how the machines worked. I don't know whether 1-3 are true but given the facts, they very well might be. I can't prove the trucstop did nothing wrong, it's none of my business. There is an argument in logic that says the truckstop cannot prove they did nothing wrong because you cannot prove a negative. Not one post has said that they have been charged or convicted of anything. Things that really shouldn't be used in a debate/argument: - Guilt by accusation - Guilt by association - Proof by emphatic assertion Shout as loudly as you want that Mr. Hofmann's integrity is in question because one of his many contributers was a business that has not been charged with anything but is alleged to be under Federal Investigation that may result in some charges someday several year from now. Say it as many times as you like, I'm still not going to condemn the man. I will question why it is so important to you that I, and everyone else, believe this. I will also wonder why this all came up just one week before the election. Could it be that Mr. Hofmann's other points are correct? Could it be that this is a planned attack by Mr. Rhodes or his supporters? It sure feels like it is. Mr. Rhodes has the most to gain from an attack against Mr. Hofmann; there is a job and a lot of money at stake. Follow the money. One last thing, and this may very well be my last post in this thread, If 15 machines and thousands of dollars were seized but the Sheriff's office piece of the action will be in the millions, how do I get in on that type of investment? I have a few thousand that I would like to turn into millions! Hey, vote for whoever you want for whatever reason you want. We have vanilla and chocolate, chicken and beef, coke and pepsi, and we have Hofmann and Rhodes. You have who you like and I have who I like and it's perfectly acceptable that they are different people.
|
|
|
Post by The Gatekeeper on Nov 3, 2006 7:21:28 GMT -4
Old Timer your absolutely right about this drug issue. It is killing anyone who comes into contact with it. There has been so much damage caused in Our country by drugs, its unbeleivable. But before the police, sheriff or any law enfocement agency can help you or me, they have to police themselves. Unfortunately, corruption still exists today within these agencies. I see it everyday on the news.
|
|
|
Post by Just the facts on Nov 3, 2006 10:52:25 GMT -4
Falger25. I'm with you on that one. Wat an investment. I too would like to invest several thousand in return for a couple million. How can I get in on the action. (lol) I think you have it wrong. I not saying Mr. Hofmann is on the take. Not at all. I like Mr. Hofmann very much and should he win sheriff,thats fine with me. I'm just saying that I thought it was in poor judgement on his behalf to except the money and I think many of voters will think the same. It may or may not sway voters only time will tell. I do not think Mr. Rhodes had anything to do with this issue at all. It's my understanding that this incident was brought up by a current county commisoner (Mike Kovel) who lost in the primary. But i do think it will raise questions in the voters mind. Both candidates are good people but they have a different direction for the agency. Rhodes direction is to protect and serve with the main focus of criminal investigations and drug enforcement. Reducing the amount of drugs in the community and conducting good criminal investigations. Mr. Hofmann's primary focus is traffic enforcment with the emphysis on speeding. Voters have to ask themselves what is the most important issue to them. Speeders or drug problems. If the citizens want the police to hammer them on speeding then so be it and it will be done. I'm sure the deputies will be more than happy to stop you for traveling 5 miles an hour ovedr the speed limit, make you more late to work than you already are and then hit you with an $ 80.00 dollar ticket, which carries one point. Andd after your convicted your can pay higher insurance rates. Sounds good to me if thats what the voters want. And if you want to fight the ticket by coming to court. Great! please do, more overtimne for the deputies. If the deputies are working day shift then they all can spend there day in court with no police out in the communites to deter crime and answer calls for service. If thats what the voters want then so be it. I'm sure the police officers won't mind. Mr. Hofmann is a very good guy who treats his deputies good. But just remember being a good supervisor and a nice guy does not automatically make someone a good chief or sheriff. Just a point of view and I wish both canidates the best of luck.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Nov 3, 2006 11:09:13 GMT -4
Questioned the States Attorneys Office as well as court documents and records from Virginia....public Access sources.
This is the deal....
As Mr. Falgar has stated (kudos to you Sir),the company out of Virginia and other states that supply the video poker and such games is actually the only company currently being investigated by the government. The truck stop, per open records, received 100% of their money and machines back from the sate and government. They were cleared from any wrong doing and will never be re-charged because of the owners help with the facts that were able charge these other companys. He was given complete immunity in the case.
The owner of the truck stop here in Centreville gave authorities all the information that he had on the company in question and has actually been cleared of any wrong doing. It is true that the offices that were involved in the investigation may receive part of the funds that the Virginia based company may be liable for.
The TTT Truckstop has been completely cleared from the investigation and is not involved in any way with the ongoing investigation. If anyone would like the specifics the gentleman who owns the restaurant (Mr.Sookie) is willing to speak with anyone who wants to know. Also as stated there are the same exact machines in Hillside, Moose, American Legion. And I guarantee that every single person has at one time or another frequented these machines,eaten dinner in these restaurants, or had drinks in these bars. If you have then you too are associated with giving these establishments your money. Which also makes you an associate of the owners???
I for one am tired of this subject and also agree that Mr. Beville and Mr. Rhodes are attempting to discredit Mr. Hofmann at the final hour.
There are apparently alot of holes in the local investigation of this case. Proper procedures were not followed and this investigation is in the process of having its documents re-visited. It looks like this poor attempt of sabotage is going to backfire on those who started this rumor. Proper paperwork and poor investigating is what will cost our county and the sheriffs office to lose the money!
It is so true that what comes around goes around. I urge all of you that love this site to get back to the topics that make this site fun to visit. I believe as Mr. Falgar does that this topic is worn out and those of us that are tired of back door politics should stand up for the honest politicians by not participating in these types of blogs.
Now, who has the best crabs right now? LOL!
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Nov 3, 2006 11:33:12 GMT -4
Oh My! Just received a 20 page life history on Mr. Rhodes. 2 questions.... Where is Mrs. Rhodes. Have not seen or heard in the last year. Does anyone know? All he speaks of is the guys. Where is his wife and why does he not have enough respect to ever mention his wife or children? Just curious.
|
|
|
Post by Courious Voter on Nov 3, 2006 11:49:13 GMT -4
Quest! I am confused on why it matters whether or not Mr. Rhodes mentions his wife and children. As a voter I could care less about that. What I care about is the person who will do the best job and most qualified for it. Mr. Rhodes has been all around the county and if you want to hear from him go stop up in Church Hill and visit him or go hear him at the sheriff forum's. Call him up and ask him what he stands for and the direction he wants the agency to go in. As a voter I could care less about his wife and kids. I care about what he is going to do as a sheriff to protect and serve me and my family. I have no idea why he does not mention his wife nor child and it does not matter. Maybe he does not have any children, maybe he is not married. maybe he does not like his wife. I have no idea and I don't think the majority voters on either side (D or R) care one way or the other, except you. The bottom line is this. Which candidate is the best. I'm not sure where you are going with this but it has nothing to do with the office of the sheriff. Voters should be voting on who they fell will get the job done, not about the person's family. Mr. Beville had pictures of him with his wife and you see how far that got him.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Nov 3, 2006 11:53:14 GMT -4
Dear Voter, I could not agree with you more..Just curious...He sends out so much material with him and his brothers and they are mentioned everywhere. Just curious! Have not seen a spouse or children ever. Not a big deal. Sorry to offend anyone.
|
|
|
Post by Courious voter on Nov 3, 2006 12:10:12 GMT -4
Quest: No big deal! None offense taken. I just want the voters to vote for the best candidate for the job. It's going to be a close race no matter how you cut it. I hear what your saying and have no idea why he has not mentioned his family if he has a wife and child or children. I'm not sure who I am going to vote for yet but I just want the person who will fulfill his duties as the chief law enforcement officer and bring the public safety to a higher level in the county. What i do want is a sheriff who will take the drug problem head on and not worry about speeders. The drug problem is the root to the majority of crimes. Reduce the drugs and you will lower your crime and criminal investigations. The drug problem is out of control in Queen Anne's County. More people are dying because of drug abuse than from a speeder in cloverfields or some other development. Why is Mr. Hofmann's focus on traffic. The county police (Sheriff's Office) should be out in the communities patrolling, deterring crime. Getting the drugs off the street. Leave the ticketing to the ticket police, Maryland State Police.
|
|
|
Post by Guest on Nov 3, 2006 12:40:11 GMT -4
Thanks....If you have had any chances to attend any forums then you can definately tell that they both have almost the exact same priorities. Both are a major topic. As we are a major thouroughfare for surrounding states traffic and drugs seem to go hand in hand. The major cartels are driving thru our state instaed of the local beltways. So both are just as important. The issue is that the public and the complaints that come from them is almost 85% traffic related. We have to attack both issues.
They are both qualified and while those around them are arguing specif topics these two gentlemen seem to be willing to work with each other as they always have. The difference is that Mr. Hofmann still actively works the road currently. He makes drug and dwi arrests with the rest of his patrol group. He is young and full of ambition. And let's face it it has been a long time since Mr. Rhodes has worked active cases, made arrests, or worked full service patrol groups.
Things will be better anyway it comes out. Good luck to them both. I have been impressed with them both. I am excited fro the change. I will say however that Mr. Hofmann has impressed me by one simple thing.....He always is the first one to tell the people of our community that Mr. Rhodes is a great man and we are in a win/win position. That does impress Me with all the dirty politics going on right now. He has kept hid promise of running a clean campaign. I for one am so tired of reading the "crap" in the paper every day. I am looking forward to the end. Good luck to both of them.
Again no offense intended. Good weekend to all!
|
|
|
Post by pete jr on Nov 3, 2006 19:16:06 GMT -4
T.V. News WJZ, CNN, reported that the worlds fish supply is in serious danger of being depleted by 2040 due to pollution. Our bay is well on its way, and probably beyond the point of recovery. The waterman knew it 40 years ago. Apparently the DNR police under Charlie knew more than those uneducated nobodies. As a boy you could see a crab on the bottom in 20' of water. Now you can't see your feet in 3'. If yoy catch a fish in the Corsica River with corn or peanuts in it, throw it back. It's probably not a fish.
|
|
Insider from within
Guest
|
Post by Insider from within on Nov 3, 2006 19:36:19 GMT -4
Quest, Now thats funny stuff! I have heard it all. Of all the comments being thrown around about the candidates that last one takes the cake. You put a smile on my face. I like and respect Mr. Hofmann very much but he is out on the road with the deputies on a daily basis. Mr. Hofmann is getting DWI arrests as well as Drug arrests. Thats news to me and the rest of the deputies. I think President Clinton was in office back when Mr. Hofmann had his last drug arrest. It has probably been three years since his last DWI arrest. After all he is a Sergeant. The poor man is primarily a highly paid secretary with a gun, which is in no way his fault. You can thank the current administration for that. The citizens pay over $ 60,000 dollars a year for a police officer to answer phones in the office as all the Sergeants do. Mr. Hofmann is a great supervisor and person but it has been many years since he has stuffed them and cuffed them.
|
|
Former Deputy B Schwaab
Guest
|
Post by Former Deputy B Schwaab on Nov 3, 2006 21:48:06 GMT -4
to Sally. How dare you!! First of all I do not remember working with a Deputy by the name of Sally. Unless you have been subjected to the harsh treatment under this administration that the Deputies have had to endure, NO YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND the frustration. Let me say that any Deputy that expresses an opinion about the current administration better remain anonymous. They would not have a moments peace if they were caught voicing a opinion other than what they are supposed to say as directed. And FYI the FOP has never been allowed to flourish as the Chief Deputy has had a lot to do with the organization and has actually been on the Board Of Directors. So, yes this is against the by laws but in this county the bosses make up the rules. In closing unless you have worked for this agency and have been on the "_ick Wheel" that every Deputy gets a turn on, you ARE NOT ENTITLED to refer to them as UNPROFESSIONAL!!! They have earned the right to speak out after many years of harsh treatment by a DICTATORSHIP.
|
|
|
Post by Insider on Nov 4, 2006 2:53:20 GMT -4
Quest, I hear you what you are saying about the traffic and that Queen Anne's County is a major thoroughfare for the drug cartels. But heres the thing. The drug cartels are primarily traveling on route 50 and route 301. Just a little inside info! The sheriff's dept. doesn't do drug interdiction work. The deputies do not work those above roads, which you can thank the current administration and command staff. The deputies are sitting in some development which has one life hater who calls the police every day about people speeding down there street. The deputy spends his time to appease the one life hater and it's a bunch of crap. You actually get 5 driver's who are always the same ones who are driving fast and thats it. I really don't think that deputies sitting on Nichols Manor Drive is going to nail the major drug cartel that you are talking about. Yes cars and drugs go hand and hand but you have to work where the major drug cartels are traveling and there not driving around chester harbor, cloverfields, Bay City, Marling Farms, Etc.
|
|
|
Post by Jelly Fish on Nov 4, 2006 19:47:03 GMT -4
Mr. Rhodes has my vote. In just three days were will find out! I'm familiar with Mr. Hofmann and I gave to agree with many of the other writers. Mr. Hofmann is a nice guy that promises you the world and delivers on zero. I have called the sheriff's office several times concerning issues in my development, spoke with Mr. Hofmann and gives you a great line of feel good bull. Mr. Hofmann tells you what you want to hear and does not delivery the goods. The people are not stupid and the promise you the world and deliver none catches up with you.
|
|
|
Post by Just the Facts on Nov 5, 2006 10:17:51 GMT -4
This response was posted on The Sentinel Whispers by former Sheriff's Candidate Earl Beville, setting the the record straight. After being told by several individuals that my name was being mentioned on this site I feel as if I must respond. After the primary election my family and I were actually relieved that my bid for Sheriff was over. I felt as if we finally had our lives back and we could go about our private lives. Also after the primary election I also decided that I was no longer interested in reading the local papers or for that matter, getting heavily involved in politics again.
Numerous friends called to see how my wife and I were doing since we had not been seen at republican functions. During the campaign my wife and I met hundreds of wonderful people, gave out almost one-thousand child identity safety kits to families for free. Quite frankly, we were happy to have a life again and glad that I have finally put any political aspirations behind us.
A critical part of running for political office, especially law enforcement is total honesty. During the primary campaign, Gary Hofmann attempted to cleverly indicate in advertisements that he had the much sought after support of the Maryland State Troopers, Natural Resource Police Officers and Maryland Transportation Police Officers. I pointed out in my advertisements in the local papers that Gary DID NOT have these endorsements which we all now know is true since Charlie Rhodes, the other candidate for Sheriff has recently officially received those very police endorsements Gary Hofmann claimed to have had.
Also during my campaign numerous citizens expressed to me that they were tired of having a Sheriff who just never seemed to be around and had other interests. Therefore, I thought it was important to make the public aware that Gary Hofmann was the owner of three tanning businesses in two counties as well as his vending machine business and that much of his time would be spent in those endeavors. To make sure that he was in fact the owner of these businesses, I even obtained copies of Gary's business permits in September (that's right, after March of 2006) that lists his home address as the owners.
Let me make something perfectly clear; there is nothing wrong with Gary Hofmann starting these businesses several years ago and continuing to make them successful. Although in August in his advertisements Gary stated that he "turned the day to day business over to his wife", this obviously meant that he was still the owner and responsible. Does that mean that as Sheriff if he were to turn over the day to day operations over to someone else he would not be responsible, of course not, he would still be responsible as the Sheriff. Although my advertisements were 100% factual, Gary's associates started a personal negative campaign against me for brining out these facts. In no way did I attack Gary Hofmann personally, I only brought out his business interests so the public could judge for themselves.
Recently a friend and I were talking when he stated that I was suppose to be "going door to door campaigning for Charlie Rhodes". My response was that information was not true then I asked,"Who starts this stuff anyway?"
Fast forward to the latest revelation that is here on this site;
"Fact number seven" WRONG / A person by the name of "John Dobson" was never associated with my campaign.
"Fact number eight" WRONG / I was at Holly's restaurant spoke to and sat with Chris Rhodes and Charlie Rhodes, Kenny Rhodes was not at Holly's. As for the "meeting to plan how to dicredit Gary", if this was such a "conspiracy" don't you think we would have done this at our homes instead of Holly's restaurant for the whole world to see, give me a break. As for meeting their often, that is absolutely false.
As for me speaking to Chris and Charlie Rhodes, I have known the Rhodes famliy for over 36 years, Chris Rhodes worked for me when I was the Commander of the Caroline and Queen Anne's Narcotic Task Force. And finally, I don't think that Charlie Rhodes needs my help in running his campaign and I have not offered any and am not seeking a position within the Sheriff Department if and when he wins.
And finally, regarding the contributions from the Truck Stop. The reporter from the newspaper called me and asked me to comment on what she had found out while examining campaign contributions of the Sheriff's candidates. I told the reporter that I really did not want to comment as I was trying to stay out of the political scene. The reported asked me that if I would have taken money from a business that was under investigation and I stated "NO". I also said that if as a Trooper, I even associated with someone currently under investigation, let alone took money from them in any way shape or form, I would have faced disciplinary action and probably fired.
In conclusion, hopefully this clears the air. What gave me great comfort after my loss was realizing the fact that out of my 28 years as serving as a Maryland State Trooper, 20 of those years were here in my County. I guess that giving at least a quarter of my life serving in Queen Anne's County was a pretty good way to help my fellow friends and neighbors. As I stated during my campaign "THE MOST IMPORTANT VOTE YOU CAST WILL BE FOR THE SAFETY OR OUR FAMILIES".
As for any further responses from me, there will be none.
Earl Beville
|
|
|
Post by LWR012aolcom on Nov 5, 2006 21:54:47 GMT -4
Lets look into the real issue, deputies and troopers contributing to this web site while working? Just speculation, but when we get a Sheriff, I hope that he opens an inquiry, and subpoena's all of the ISP information from "Kent Island On Line".
Lets talk about police working, maybe we would not have all of the speeding and drug complaints if they (not all, of course) spent the time on the county roads, instead of the office, barracks and satellite offices.
I bet in Anne Arundle and Queen Anne's County, you will be surprised to see who the bloggers are, and are they wasting yours and my tax dollar, while working!
I believe in FREEDOM of SPEECH, but not on my dime.
Lets just wait and see.
Good luck to Rhodes and Hoffman, either of you will have your work cut out. I would not want to wear that badge.
|
|
|
Post by Commuter21 on Nov 5, 2006 22:30:10 GMT -4
To "Falger25 and UVrays", hats off to you. After spending an hour reading this blog, you both seem to be able to read the facts and separate fiction. Good journalism! To the "Guest's" whom are not leaving their information. I wonder how many of you are "one in the same"? To the "insider" maybe its time you get out! (Seems the last blogger may force you out, better get scootin now, you may be the focus of an investigation!) To "Former deputy", maybe there was a reason, and maybe it was the best for your county! To the "pete", Justice will come, and o so sweet! Keep up your mission. To our new sheriff, good luck!
|
|
|
Post by falgar25 on Nov 5, 2006 22:32:15 GMT -4
Lets look into the real issue, deputies and troopers contributing to this web site while working? Just speculation, but when we get a Sheriff, I hope that he opens an inquiry, and subpoena's all of the ISP information from "Kent Island On Line". And if I heard a candidate suggest such a thing, he would most assuredyly NOT get my vote! I care a lot about my rights, my privacy, and the rights and privacy of others. Govt. is supposed to exist to protect my rights, not trample on them. "speculation" is no where close to a justification to violate the privacy of a company or those who use the company's services.
|
|
|
Post by bchevy on Nov 5, 2006 22:45:39 GMT -4
Lets look into the real issue, deputies and troopers contributing to this web site while working? Just speculation, but when we get a Sheriff, I hope that he opens an inquiry, and subpoena's all of the ISP information from "Kent Island On Line".
Lets talk about police working, maybe we would not have all of the speeding and drug complaints if they (not all, of course) spent the time on the county roads, instead of the office, barracks and satellite offices.
I bet in Anne Arundle and Queen Anne's County, you will be surprised to see who the bloggers are, and are they wasting yours and my tax dollar, while working!
I believe in FREEDOM of SPEECH, but not on my dime.
Lets just wait and see.
Good luck to Rhodes and Hoffman, either of you will have your work cut out. I would not want to wear that badge. Wow, "the real issue".... If you only had a clue.
|
|
|
Post by Insider on Nov 6, 2006 23:36:27 GMT -4
Commuter 21, Which insider are you referring to when you made your statement . There are dozens of writers on this site who say their name is insider. Are they all different people? Is it the same one person? How do you know it's a deputy or trooper? Maybe it is, Maybe it's not. It could be anyone on the inside. Maybe a cops wife. Maybe a deputies husband, boyfriend, girlfriend, mother father, former deputy. The sheriff's office has made many enemy's with prior employees. Am I the insider your looking for? What comment was made that really gets your blood boiling. I have not seen any comments made by any of the writers that were a direct attack on Mr. Rhodes or Mr. Hofmann. You say that this insider may be the subject of an investigation. Comments being made about deputies and troopers contributing to this site while on duty. What makes you think that and what proof do you have to make a such bold and obnoxious statement like that. In case you forgot this I'm going to remind you of something This is still the United States Of America. We live in a country that has FREE SPEECH! This site is a public forum where people can express there views and opinions no matter what they are. You don't have to agree with them but thatswhat makes this county great. And lets not go there about deputies using the internet on the citizens dime to go on this forum. At least there not on E-bay selling personal items while working! How about that for an investigation! Lets not go there. Lets just respect each others right to free speech and leave it at that! Good luck to both candidates for they are both good men! To "Falger25 and UVrays", hats off to you. After spending an hour reading this blog, you both seem to be able to read the facts and separate fiction. Good journalism! To the "Guest's" whom are not leaving their information. I wonder how many of you are "one in the same"? To the "insider" maybe its time you get out! (Seems the last blogger may force you out, better get scootin now, you may be the focus of an investigation!) To "Former deputy", maybe there was a reason, and maybe it was the best for your county! To the "pete", Justice will come, and o so sweet! Keep up your mission. To our new sheriff, good luck!
|
|
|
Post by Deputy on Nov 7, 2006 8:55:17 GMT -4
To Insider Thank you for your last post. Thank you for saying it right. Many of us have posted as anonymous for obvious reasons. Many Deputies have had a rough road under this administration. Many families have been upset and put in turmoil due to resignations and punitive action placed on them for not adhering to the established quota system. The daily harsh treatment carried home after the work day and placed unneeded pressure on the families at home. To commuter21, FYI the postings by the individuals I know have not been done on company time but prior to and after the shift has ended. Many have remained anonymous due to not trusting what the fallout may be while the current administration is in place. This election is a breath of fresh air since Sheriff Crossley and Chief Deputy Benton are leaving. This still does not bring back the good Deputies that have left the agency for the listed reasons. Good luck to the candidates and may the voters make the right choice. Again thank you and the others who listen to what we have wanted to say but could not openly for fear of disciplinary action. Deputy
|
|